::: People ::: |
Editorial Team |
Reviewer |
Contact |
::: e-ISSN and p-ISSN ::: |
::: Template ::: |
::: Tools ::: |
Publication Ethics
Ethics and Publication Behavior
Jurnal An Najah (Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Sosial Keagamaan) is a peer-reviewed journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles in this journal as well as the allegations of research errors, including the author, editor in chief, editorial board, peer-reviewers, and publishers cv najah bestari. This statement is based on COPE's Guidelines for Best Practice for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
Publishing articles in Islamic Thought Economics Journal Iqra is an important building block in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support it. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on standards of ethical behavior expected of all parties involved in publishing actions: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers, and the public.
CV An Najah as the publisher of the Jurnal An Najah (Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Sosial Keagamaan) Thought takes guardianship over all stages of publishing very seriously, and we acknowledge ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or other commercial revenue does not impact or influence editorial decisions.
Allegations of Research Violation
Research violations are falsification, forgery, citation manipulation, or plagiarism in the creation, implementation or review of research and article writing by the author, or in reporting research results. If the author is found to be involved in research error or other serious irregularities involving articles that have been published in scientific journals, the Editor has the responsibility to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.
In cases of suspected violations, the Editor and the Editorial Board will use COPE best practices to help them resolve complaints and deal fairly with violations. This will include an investigation into the allegations by the Editor. Submissions that are found to contain such errors will be rejected. In cases where the published paper is found to contain such an error, a repeal can be published and will be linked to the original article.
The first step involves determining the validity of the allegations and assessing whether the allegations are consistent with the definition of research error. This initial step also involves determining whether an individual suspected of committing an offense has a relevant conflict of interest.
If scientific error or the presence of other substantial research irregularities is a possibility, the allegations are shared with the respective authors, who, on behalf of all co-authors, are asked to provide detailed responses. Once responses are received and evaluated, additional review and involvement of experts (such as statistical reviewers) can be obtained. For cases where minor violations may occur, clarification, additional analysis, or both, published as a letter to the editor, and often including notice of corrections and corrections to published articles is sufficient.
Institutions are expected to carry out appropriate and thorough investigations into suspected scientific violations. Ultimately, authors, journals and institutions have an important obligation to ensure the accuracy of scientific records. By responding appropriately to concerns about scientific errors, and taking the necessary actions based on the evaluation of these problems, such as correction, repeal with replacement, and repeal, Jurnal Takfirul Iqtishodiyyah (JTI): Islamic Economic Thought will continue to fulfill its responsibility to ensure validity and scientific record integrity.
Publication decisions
The editor of the Jurnal An Najah (Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Sosial Keagamaan) Thought is responsible for deciding which articles to publish in the journal. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive such decisions. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by the legal requirements that will apply regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Complaints and Appeals
Jurnal Jurnal An Najah (Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Sosial Keagamaan) Thought will have clear procedures for handling complaints against journals, editors, editorial boards or publishers. Complaints will be clarified to a respected individual regarding the complaint case. The scope of the complaint includes everything related to the journal business process, namely pros editorial
::: People ::: |
Editorial Team |
Reviewer |
Contact |
::: e-ISSN and p-ISSN ::: |
::: Template ::: |
::: Tools ::: |
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional
Diterbitkan Oleh Indonesian Society of Applied Science.